Analysis of the Financial Fraud Case of Hengli Industrial Development Group Co.,Ltd.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71204/6zx33h26Keywords:
Financial Fraud, Business Ethics, Audit Failure, Accounting Professional EthicsAbstract
Under the circumstances where the regulation on delisting in the capital market is becoming stricter, financial fraud not only disrupts the market order, but also highlights the serious harm caused by the deviation of accounting ethics and business ethics. Hengli Enterprise, as a listed company in the automotive air conditioning industry, from 2020 to the first half of 2023, in order to avoid the risk of delisting and ensure the private compensation of senior management,through its wholly-owned subsidiary, constructed a closed loop of ethylene glycol trade without commercial substance, and adopted means such as falsely increasing revenue and profits, fabricating accounts receivable turnover rate,and forging fund flow to carry out systematic financial fraud. The cumulative false increase in operating income was 595 million yuan. Eventually, due to the exposure of fraud, it was delisted and suspended by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. The relevant responsible persons and the auditing institution were all severely punished. This article takes this case as the research object, combines the core points of the new business ethics and accounting ethics courses, uses the fraud triangle theory to analyze the pressure,opportunity and excuse motivations of fraud,systematically sorts out the commercial ethics deviations of directors, supervisors and management in the fraud, and explores the deep reasons for audit failure from four dimensions: accounting firms, certified public accountants, the audited entity and the external environment. The research aims to reveal the implementation logic and harm of financial fraud, provide practical references for listed companies to strengthen corporate governance, adhere to the bottom line of accounting ethics, and improve the audit supervision system, and help the capital market develop healthily and orderly.
Downloads
References
Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-9611271988
Cohen, J. R., Pant, L. W., & Sharp, N. C. (1996). Ethical sensitivity in professional accounting: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1179–1186.
Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00489.x
Hoffman, V. B., & Patton, J. M. (1997). Auditors' ethical reasoning: The effects of context and organizational environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(13), 1377–1389.
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue–contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258867
Kaplan, S. E., & White, J. B. (1988). Ethical decision making in accounting: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(11), 883–893.
Loebbecke, J. K., Eining, M. M., & Willingham, J. J. (1989). Auditors' experience with material irregularities: Frequency, nature, and detectability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice&Theory, 9(1), 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-4682433
Messier, W. F. Jr. (2000). The effects of experience and industry specialization on auditors' fraud risk assessments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2), 1–17.
Rezaee, Z. (2005). Causes, consequences, and deterrence of financial statement fraud. Research in Accounting Regulation, 17(1), 1–34.
Trompeter, G. (1994). The effect of audit firm structure on audit quality. The Accounting Review, 69(3), 455–470.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kexin Chi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are properly credited. Authors retain copyright of their work, and readers are free to copy, share, adapt, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use, as long as appropriate attribution is given.
