Analysis of Long-term Investment Decision-making Problems of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China

Authors

  • Jintong Luo Beijing City University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71204/nkect757

Keywords:

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Long-Term Investment, Investment Decision-Making, Financial Management, Risk Control, Cash-Flow Management

Abstract

This paper takes Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (ICBC) as the case company and analyzes the long-term investment decision-making and financial management issues of commercial banks. Based on the case materials concerning ICBC’s investments in technology finance, green finance, inclusive finance, pension finance, and digital financial infrastructure, the paper organizes indicators including the scale of long-term investment, the proportion of financial-asset investment, return on investment, investment payback period, net present value, and internal rate of return from 2022 to 2024. It further evaluates the actual effects of long-term investment decision-making from the perspectives of changes in investment scale, investment structure, return levels, cash-flow recovery, and risk management. The study finds that ICBC’s long-term investment is characterized by relatively strong strategic alignment, broad investment coverage, significant digital empowerment, and a solid risk-control foundation. However, the growth of long-term investment has not been accompanied by a corresponding improvement in investment efficiency: ROI, NPV, and IRR have all declined; the proportion of financial-asset investment remains relatively high; new investment projects do not sufficiently consider micro-level variables such as cross-border regulation, peer competition, and transaction volume; and some projects face prolonged cash-flow recovery periods and insufficient post-investment management. In response, this paper proposes optimizing the structure of financial and non-financial investments, improving a multidimensional investment evaluation system, strengthening cash-flow budgeting and maturity matching, and establishing dynamic risk-warning and post-investment evaluation mechanisms. By incorporating strategic objectives, financial indicators, cash-flow management, and risk control into a unified decision-making framework, commercial banks can further improve the efficiency of long-term fund allocation and achieve a better balance between returns and risks in a complex operating environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ba, S. S., & Yang, C. B. (2024). Return measurement and risk identification of digital infrastructure investment in the banking industry. New Finance, (4), 23–29.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2022). Guidelines for the management of climate-related financial risks in banking. Bank for International Settlements.

Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2021). Principles of corporate finance (Y. Wang, Trans.). China Machine Press.

Chen, Y. T. (2023). Research on the optimization of the NPV–IRR evaluation system for commercial bank project investment. Financial Forum, 28(4), 67–76.

Damodaran, A. (2021). Investment valuation: Tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset (Q. Lin, Trans.). Tsinghua University Press.

Diamond, D. W. (2022). Money, banking and financial markets (Z. L. Zheng, Trans.). Peking University Press.

Huang, D., & Zhang, J. (2023). Finance (4th ed.). Renmin University of China Press.

ICBC Research Institute. (2024). Research report on long-term fund allocation by large state-owned commercial banks. Industrial and Commercial Bank of China.

Li, Y. (2024). Strategic investment and post-investment management of large commercial banks in the digital finance era. The Banker, (2), 78–81.

Li, Z. H., & Li, M. Y. (2021). Research on investment business efficiency and risk control of Chinese commercial banks. Journal of Financial Research, (6), 112–128.

Lu, Z. W., & Tang, W. Q. (2023). Research on the coordinated development path of green finance and inclusive finance. Industrial Bank Economic Research Consulting Co., Ltd.

Pan, M., Yuan, Y., & Zhu, Y. X. (2026). Bank environmental responsibility, post-loan management, and corporate green loan “greenwashing”. Journal of Financial Research, (5), 78–95.

Song, K., Xu, L., & Li, Z. (2022). Can ESG investment promote banks’ liquidity creation? The moderating effect of economic policy uncertainty. Journal of Financial Research, (2), 61–79.

Wang, Y., & Liu, Q. (2022). Investment decision-making mechanisms and risk prevention and control of green finance in commercial banks. Modern Finance and Economics, 42(9), 45–58.

Wu, W. X., & Zhang, X. Y. (2024). Research on long-term fund allocation and investment structure optimization of state-owned commercial banks. Contemporary Economic Science, 46(1), 89–98.

Xie, P., & Zou, C. W. (2023). Cost-benefit analysis and investment decision-making for digital financial infrastructure construction. International Economic Review, (5), 92–110.

Zhang, X. M., & Qian, A. M. (2022). Financial statement analysis (5th ed.). Renmin University of China Press.

Zhang, Z. P., & Tan, Q. Y. (2025). Exploration of the integrated development path of green finance and inclusive finance in commercial banks. Journal of Rural Finance Research, (3), 34–42.

Zhong, K., & Cheng, X. K. (2023). Research on maturity mismatch in investment and financing and long-term fund allocation by commercial banks. Management World, 39(2), 134–147.

Zhou, Y. Q. (2023). Development logic and investment risk control of pension finance business in commercial banks. Financial Theory and Practice, (8), 1–10.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-14

How to Cite

Analysis of Long-term Investment Decision-making Problems of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. (2026). Journal of Historical, Cultural and Social Sciences, 2(3), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.71204/nkect757

Similar Articles

1-10 of 17

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.